From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 6, 2023
2:16-cv-00498-JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:16-cv-00498-JLR

02-06-2023

SABELITA HAWKINS Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al Defendants.

Tuella O. Sykes, WSBA No. 36179 Attorney for Plaintiff KRISTIN B. JOHNSON, WSBA #28189 Assistant United States Attorney


Tuella O. Sykes, WSBA No. 36179 Attorney for Plaintiff

KRISTIN B. JOHNSON, WSBA #28189 Assistant United States Attorney

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULES

HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The Plaintiff, Sabelita Hawkins (“Plaintiff” or “Hawkins”), and the Defendants, United States of America, et al (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, jointly submit the following Stipulation to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set by the Court and agree that this case can be moved to the end of the Court's trial calendar. The parties previously filed a joint status report requesting relief from the discovery deadline and a continuance of the trial date. Dkt. 61. On January 20, 2023, the Court issued an Order stating that the Court is will ing to consider moving the Parties' trial date to the end of its trial calendar, likely in the summer of 2024. Dkt. 62. The Court noted that if it moves this matter to the end of its trial calendar, the Court will also issue a new scheduling order with respect to all unexpired pretrial deadlines. Id. The Court directed the parties to file a stipulated motion if they wish to seek this relief. Id. The parties hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully request this relief

The Stipulation is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b). The Parties recently discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which were not previously disclosed in 2016. The United States will need to collect and review the records of these additional treatment providers. Additionally, the parties will also need to update the damage discovery following the receipt of these records. For all these reasons the parties set out a proposal and request an extension of the current case schedule.

I. SYNOPSIS OF THE CASE

The Ninth Circuit on September 28, 2021 reversed the district court's October 1, 2019 judgment and remanded for further proceedings. On November 22, 2021, a Mandate was issued in this Court. This Court entered an Order Directing a Status Report on November 23, 2021 within twenty-one (21) days of the Order. The parties filed their Joint Status Report on December 12, 2021 requesting at least 60 days to engage in the settlement discussions or up until February 14, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this request and a Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file settlement paperwork or another Joint Status Report by April 11, 2022.” This additional request for time is being made to provide time for the Defendant to contact one of the Primary Care Physician witnesses who is no longer with the VA Puget Sound Health Care System as well as for continued settlement discussions. On April 11, 2022, the parties filed their Joint Status Report and requested at least sixty (60) days to engage in settlement discussions or up until June 10, 2022, before this Court sets a Settlement Conference. The Court granted this request and a Minute Order was entered stating the following: “The parties are directed to file settlement paperwork or another Joint Status Report by June 10, 2022.” A Joint Status Report was filed on June 16, 2022 by the parties and a trial date was set June 24, 2022. A minute order setting trial date and related dates was entered by this Court on June 24, 2022.

See Docket No. 49

See Docket No. 50

See Docket No. 21

See Docket No. 52

See Docket No. 55

See Docket No. 56

See Docket No. 57

See Docket No. 59

See Docket No. 60

In light of the Ninth Circuit's Ruling the parties have conferred and request an extension of the current discovery deadline which is currently set for February 13, 2023 and extended to May 18, 2023. And an extension of the trial date which is currently set for June 12, 2023.

Pending Motions

There are no pending motions before this Court for this case.

II. STIPULATION OF PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL AND CORRESPONDING PRE-TRIAL DATES BASED ON GOOD FAITH

The parties stipulate and agree to a continuance of the pre-trial and trial dates to some time at the end of the Court's trial calendar for the following reasons: (1) Parties recently discovered additional treatment providers of the Plaintiff, Ms. Sabelita Hawkins, which were not previously disclosed in 2016; (2) The United States will need to collect and review the records of these additional treatment providers; and (3) Additionally, the parties will also need to update the damage discovery following the receipt of these records. The February 13, 2023 discovery deadline does not provide the Parties sufficient time to prepare discovery and update the damage discovery following the receipt of the Plaintiff's records.

The parties stipulate and agree to continue the trial and pre-trial dates and deadlines set by the Court and agree to some time at the end of the Court's trial calendar. Without this continuance of the dates, the parties will be prejudiced. The parties have been complying with the current dates and deadlines set forth in the Court's case schedule. The parties agree to extend the unexpired deadlines of the trial order. This continuance of the dates and deadlines would serve to avoid any potential fees and costs, as well as waste of judicial resources and time, filing potential motions after the cut-off dates for leave to amend the scheduling order. To this end, the parties stipulate and agree to a trial continuance to some time at the end of the Court's trial calendar.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) gives the Court broad discretion to regulate pretrial matters, to manage its calendar, grant continuances of scheduling dates, and to direct the parties in a manner that expedites disposition of the action and facilitates settlement. As set forth herein, good cause exists for the Court to grant the continuance under any of the Rules.

IT IS SO STIUPLATED.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Trial Date is continued, and an Amended Case Schedule will be set by the Court per its current calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 6, 2023
2:16-cv-00498-JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Hawkins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SABELITA HAWKINS Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 6, 2023

Citations

2:16-cv-00498-JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023)