From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jan 31, 2007
No. 12-06-00386-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2007)

Opinion

No. 12-06-00386-CR.

Opinion delivered January 31, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 114TH Judicial District Court of Summit County, Texas .

Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of indecency with a child, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for twenty years. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, which was untimely, and this court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Hawkins v. State , No. 12-94-00028-CR (Tex.App.-Tyler Feb. 17, 1994, no pet.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). On Appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus, the court of criminal appeals granted him an out of time appeal. Ex parte Hawkins , No. AP-75,521 (Tex.Crim.App. Oct. 4, 2006) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). Appellant then timely filed his notice of appeal. To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court's full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court's certification of the appellant's right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see also Odneal v. State , 161 S.W.3d 692, 694 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2005, pet. ref'd) (noting that trial court certification is required when court of criminal appeals grants out of time appeal). The certification should be part of the record when the notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation. Id. Appellant's notice of appeal does not include the required certification. On November 10, 2006, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before December 11, 2006, the clerk's record was amended to include the required certification. The deadline for responding to this court's notice has expired, and the clerk's record has not been amended to show Appellant's right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction .


Summaries of

Hawkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jan 31, 2007
No. 12-06-00386-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Hawkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAY CHARLES HAWKINS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Jan 31, 2007

Citations

No. 12-06-00386-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Hawkins v. State

However, his attorney did not file a required certification from the trial court, and we dismissed his…

Ex Parte Hawkins

The Twelfth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal. Hawkins v. State, No. 12-06-00386-CR (Tex.App.-Tyler,…