From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jul 3, 2014
147 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–645.

07-03-2014

Geno L. HAWKINS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

To the extent that petitioner challenges his conviction, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000). To the extent that petitioner challenges the actions of the First DCA in case number 1 D09–4856, the petition is hereby dismissed. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So.3d 776 (Fla.2014). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied.

LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jul 3, 2014
147 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Hawkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Geno L. HAWKINS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jul 3, 2014

Citations

147 So. 3d 523 (Fla. 2014)

Citing Cases

Hawkins v. Jones

We have never granted Hawkins the relief sought by him in any of his filings.Hawkins v. Jones , No.…