Opinion
No. SC14–645.
07-03-2014
Opinion
To the extent that petitioner challenges his conviction, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000). To the extent that petitioner challenges the actions of the First DCA in case number 1 D09–4856, the petition is hereby dismissed. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So.3d 776 (Fla.2014). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied.
LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.