Opinion
CASE NO.: SC14-645 Lower Tribunal No.: 1D09-4856 Lower Tribunal No.: 08-656CFMA
07-03-2014
To the extent that petitioner challenges his conviction, because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that petitioner challenges the actions of the First DCA in case number 1D09-4856, the petition is hereby dismissed. See Mathews v. Crews, 132 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 2014). Any motions or other requests for relief are hereby denied. LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
HON. PAMELA JO BONDI
GENO L. HAWKINS, SR.
HON. NICHOLAS THOMAS, CLERK
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK