Hawkins V. State

4 Citing cases

  1. Mitchell v. State

    610 S.E.2d 672 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 2 times

    (Emphasis in original.) Hawkins v. State, 249 Ga. App. 26, 27-28 (1) ( 546 SE2d 280) (2001). See id.

  2. Dorsey v. State

    595 S.E.2d 106 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 7 times

    See Clark v. State, supra at 504.Hawkins v. State, 249 Ga. App. 26 (1) ( 546 S.E.2d 280) (2001). 2.

  3. Kantorik v. State

    257 Ga. App. 828 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 6 times

    Compare id. at 126-127; see Moreno v. State, 204 Ga. App. 463 (1) ( 419 S.E.2d 735) (1992). Here, the court was correct in finding that the equal access rule did not apply as (1) Kantorik was the owner of a vehicle in which drugs were found and a passenger, (2) the driver stated that the drugs did not belong to her, (3) the drugs were in plain view on the passenger side of the vehicle where Kantorik was sitting, and (4) Kantorik told the driver not to stop and fled the scene when approached by officers (see Hawkins v. State, 249 Ga. App. 26, 27-28(1) ( 546 S.E.2d 280) (2001) (finder of fact was authorized to consider evidence that defendant fled in evaluating his consciousness of guilt)). See Petty, supra, 221 Ga. App. at 126-127.

  4. Harris v. State

    257 Ga. App. 42 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 8 times
    Finding that State proved venue beyond a reasonable doubt where the witness testified that he did not think any of the events occurred outside of the county

    (Punctuation omitted.) Hawkins v. State, 249 Ga. App. 26, 27(1) ( 546 S.E.2d 280) (2001). See Morgan, supra at 59(1).