From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Sep 29, 1995
675 So. 2d 1361 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)

Opinion

CR-94-1084.

September 29, 1995.

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court (CC-89-1145.60 and 89-1146.60); Lawson Little, Judge.

Vincent Edward Hawkins, pro se.

Kevin Moulton, Dothan (appointed August 7, 1995, on remand), for appellant.

Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Beth Poe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


ON RETURN TO REMAND


Vincent Edward Hawkins filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition with the Houston Circuit Court, attacking his convictions for murder and second degree assault. This case was originally remanded because this court was unable to determine whether the trial court had denied the appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis or his Rule 32 petition. On remand, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing. However, the trial court failed to make "specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented" as required by Rule 32.9(d), Ala.R.Crim.P. Smith v. State, 620 So.2d 87 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992); Mixon v. State, 611 So.2d 420 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992). Therefore, we must remand this matter again so that the court can comply with Rule 32.9(d). A written return shall be filed with this court within 70 days of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Note from the Reporter of Decisions: On February 9, 1996, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Sep 29, 1995
675 So. 2d 1361 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)
Case details for

Hawkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Vincent Edward HAWKINS v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Sep 29, 1995

Citations

675 So. 2d 1361 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)