From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Rook

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 20, 2022
22-CV-3153 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3153 (ER)

04-20-2022

TAMEIKA LAQUISHA HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. SILVESTRE ROOK, Defendant.


ORDER OF SERVICE

EDGARDO RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons as to Defendant Silvestre Rook. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summons. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendant or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendant under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Rook

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 20, 2022
22-CV-3153 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Hawkins v. Rook

Case Details

Full title:TAMEIKA LAQUISHA HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. SILVESTRE ROOK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3153 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2022)