From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. D'Amour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2016
Civil No. 16-11657 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Civil No. 16-11657

11-16-2016

JEFFREY HAWKINS, Petitioner, v. ANDREA D'AMOUR, Respondent


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER

Before the Court is Respondent's motion seeking an additional sixty days to respond to Petitioner's habeas corpus petition. (ECF No. 5.) Respondent's counsel indicates in the motion that Petitioner's counsel does not oppose the request. (Id. ¶ 3.) For the reasons stated below, the Court is granting the motion.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may be applied to habeas proceedings to the extent those rules are not inconsistent with any statutory provisions or the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. See Rule 12 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes federal courts to extend the time for when an act must be done, for good cause, "with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A).

Respondent was ordered to respond to Petitioner's application for the writ of habeas corpus by November 15, 2016. (ECF No. 2.) Before the expiration of that deadline, Respondent filed her motion requesting an additional sixty days to answer the petition. There is good cause for Respondent's request. Specifically, part of the transcript from Petitioner's jury trial appears to be missing and Respondent needs time to locate the transcript and review it before addressing Petitioner's grounds for relief.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer is GRANTED and Respondent shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this Opinion and Order to file an answer to the petition for the writ of habeas corpus and the Rule 5 materials.

s/ Linda V. Parker

LINDA V. PARKER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 16, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, November 16, 2016, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail.

s/ Richard Loury

Case Manager


Summaries of

Hawkins v. D'Amour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2016
Civil No. 16-11657 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Hawkins v. D'Amour

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY HAWKINS, Petitioner, v. ANDREA D'AMOUR, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2016

Citations

Civil No. 16-11657 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2016)