From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 3, 2017
16-cv-1592 (FB) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2017)

Opinion

16-cv-1592 (FB) (RML)

01-03-2017

DUANE HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. BOBBIE JO BOYD and TANYA JOHNSON, Defendants.

Appearances: For Plaintiff: ZAKI ISAAC B. TAMIR RONALD LAWRENCE LANGMAN Tamir Law Group 30 Broad Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10004


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Appearances: For Plaintiff:
ZAKI ISAAC B. TAMIR
RONALD LAWRENCE LANGMAN
Tamir Law Group
30 Broad Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10004 BLOCK, Senior District Judge:

On November 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy ("MJ") issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment be granted. The R&R was docketed on November 18, 2016. To date, no objections have been filed, and more than fourteen days have passed.

Where there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) ("Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's decision."). This Court, however, will conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R without de novo review and grants plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment.

SO ORDERED.

/S/ Frederic Block

FREDERIC BLOCK

Senior United States District Judge Brooklyn, New York
January 3, 2017


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 3, 2017
16-cv-1592 (FB) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Hawkins v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:DUANE HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. BOBBIE JO BOYD and TANYA JOHNSON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 3, 2017

Citations

16-cv-1592 (FB) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Young v. Muniz

On either clear-error or de novo review, the Court finds no defect of law, fact, or logic in the R&R.…

Trieu v. Fox

On either clear-error or de novo review, the Court finds no defect of law, fact, or logic in the R&R.…