From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Aikman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Urbana Division
Jun 27, 2017
Case No. 17-2034 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 17-2034

06-27-2017

SHA'TYRA HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER AIKMAN and THOMAS PETRILLI, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 10, 2017, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Defendants Christopher Aikman and Thomas Petrilli. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff was required to serve summons on Defendant within 90 days after her Complaint was filed. Plaintiff, therefore, should have served summons on Defendant by May 10, 2017.

By May 31, 2017, 21 days after the deadline for service, Plaintiff had failed to file any proof of service. The Court, therefore, entered an Order to Show Cause (#2) as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for her failure to serve summons. The Order required a response be filed no later than June 21, 2017. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that a court may dismiss a plaintiff's case if said plaintiff fails to prosecute the case or comply with the Federal Rules or a court order. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Order.

Accordingly, the Court recommends that Plaintiff's case be DISMISSED for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The parties are advised that any objection to this recommendation must be filed in writing with the clerk within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to object will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986)

ENTERED this 27th day of June, 2017.

s/ ERIC I. LONG

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Aikman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Urbana Division
Jun 27, 2017
Case No. 17-2034 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Hawkins v. Aikman

Case Details

Full title:SHA'TYRA HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER AIKMAN and THOMAS PETRILLI…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Urbana Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

Case No. 17-2034 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2017)