From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 26, 1923
97 So. 114 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)

Opinion

3 Div. 466.

June 26, 1923.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Autauga County; W.M. Lackey, Judge.

L.C. Hawes was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age, and appeals. Reversed and remanded

The verdict of the jury was as follows: "We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment" — without fixing the punishment. The judgment of the court upon the verdict fixed the punishment at from four to six years in the penitentiary.

Gipson Booth, of Prattville, and Chester Austin, Thos. J. Judge, and Clarence Mullins, all of Birmingham, for appellant.

The court erred in receiving the verdict of the jury, which failed to fix the punishment of the defendant. Acts 1915, p. 137; Washington v. State, 125 Ala. 40, 28 So. 78; Bates v. State, 170 Ala. 26, 54 So. 432; McKinney v. State, 17 Ala. App. 474, 86 So. 121.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No brief reached the Reporter.


The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded on the following authorities: Acts 1915, p. 137; McKinney v. State, 17 Ala. App. 474, 86 So. 121; Washington v. State, 125 Ala. 40, 28 So. 78; Bates v. State, 170 Ala. 26, 54 So. 432.


Summaries of

Hawes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 26, 1923
97 So. 114 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
Case details for

Hawes v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAWES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 26, 1923

Citations

97 So. 114 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)
97 So. 114

Citing Cases

Tanner v. State

The jury alone is authorized to fix the punishment upon a conviction of the offense charged. Code 1923, §…

Smith v. State

The jury alone is authorized to fix the punishment upon a conviction for the offense of carnal knowledge.…