Opinion
2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA
04-03-2023
IEHAB HAWATMEH, individually; YASMEEN HAWATMEH, individually; LAYTH HAWATMEH, individually and IEHAB HAWATMEH, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF JOSEPH HAWATMEH, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; THEDRICK ANDRES, individually and as a policy maker and Chief of CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; LIEUTENANT THOMAS CHIELLO, individually and in his official capacity; SERGEANT JAIME SMITH fka SERGEANT JAIME CLEAR, individually and in her official capacity; SERGEANT SETH VAN BEVEREN, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER BRETT ANDERSON, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER JESSE HEHN, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER JESSE LUJAN, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER JAMES PENDLETON, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER LUIS AMEZCUA, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER PHILIP DUFFY, individually and in his official capacity; OFFICER SETH PRICE, individually and in his official capacity; DOE CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPERVISORS I through X, inclusive; and ROE CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS XI THROUGH XX, inclusive, Defendants.
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorneys for Defendants MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorney for Defendants ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Timothy E. Rhoda, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7878 Attorney for Plaintiffs
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorneys for Defendants
MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorney for Defendants
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Timothy E. Rhoda, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7878 Attorney for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR DISMISSAL (ECF NO. 39)
Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, Marquis Aurbach and Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys of record, Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd., hereby STIPULATE and agree as follows:
1. On December 13, 2022 Defendants filed their Motion for Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 25)
2. Plaintiffs opposed the Motion on March 27, 2023. (ECF No. 39)
3. Defendants' current deadline to file their reply is April 3, 2023.
4. The parties have stipulated to a one-week extension for Defendants to file to their reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition.
5. The parties agree Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) be extended to April 10, 2023.
6. Good cause exists for this extension and is not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
IT IS SO ORDERED.