From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA

12-26-2022

YASMEEN HAWATMEH, individually; LAYTH HAWATMEH, individually; and IEHAB HAWATMEH, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF JOSEPH HAWATMEH, deceased, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, et al., Defendants.

ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs MARQUIS & AURBACH CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants


ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

TIMOTHY E. RHODA, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

MARQUIS & AURBACH

CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendants

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)

COMES NOW, Plaintiffs, IEHAB HAWATMEH; YASMEEN HAWATMEH; LAYTH HAWATMEH; and IEHAB HAWATMEH, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF JOSEPH HAWATMEH, and Defendants, CITY OF HENDERSON; CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; THEDRICK ANDRES; LIEUTENANT THOMAS CHIELLO; SERGEANT JAIME SMITH fka SERGEANT JAIME CLEAR; SERGEANT SETH VAN BEVEREN;

OFFICER BRETT ANDERSON; OFFICER JESSE HEHN; OFFICER JESSE LUJAN; OFFICER JAMES PENDLETON; OFFICER LUIS AMEZCUA; OFFICER PHILIP DUFFY; OFFICER SETH PRICE,by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The Defendants hereto filed a Motion for Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) on December 13, 2022 [ECF #25]. A response to said Motion is presently due on or about December 27, 2022.

2. The Christmas and New Years Day holidays are rapidly approaching. Plaintiff's counsel has family visiting for the holidays and various associated social obligations. Plaintiffs themselves have similar obligations. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel has other work obligations, including an appellate brief, that will greatly reduce the time available to respond to the subject motion.

3. Based upon the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the deadline to file a response to the pending Motion to Dismiss be extended for approximately 60 days until February 26, 2023.

4. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 26, 2022
2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Hawatmeh v. City of Henderson

Case Details

Full title:YASMEEN HAWATMEH, individually; LAYTH HAWATMEH, individually; and IEHAB…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 26, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Dec. 26, 2022)