Hawash v. Thomas

Full title: MAHAR HAWASH, Petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Civil No. 08-685-CL (D. Or. Sep. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-685-CL.

September 23, 2008

ORDER

OWEN PANNER, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#4) is adopted. The petition (#1) is denied without prejudice to refile after petitioner has exhausted administrative remedies. All pending motions are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.