From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haverly v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 14, 2021
CV 20-04935 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-04935 DMG (RAO)

06-14-2021

FRANK HAVERLY, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation issued on December 18, 2020, to which Petitioner has objected. The Court is not persuaded by Petitioner's objections and hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Haverly v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 14, 2021
CV 20-04935 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Haverly v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:FRANK HAVERLY, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

CV 20-04935 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)