From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haut v. Rossbach

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 3, 1941
17 A.2d 165 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Decided January 3d 1941.

On appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Harry Krieger, for the appellants.

Messrs. Larkey Mareiniss Snyder, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported at 128 N.J. Eq. 77. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Haut v. Rossbach

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 3, 1941
17 A.2d 165 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Haut v. Rossbach

Case Details

Full title:FRIEDA HAUT et al., appellants, v. WILLIAM ROSSBACH et al., respondents

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 3, 1941

Citations

17 A.2d 165 (N.J. 1941)
17 A.2d 165

Citing Cases

Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. Townecraft Industries, Inc.

The question of whether or not the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from…

TATARIAN v. ALUF PLASTICS

Haut v. Rossbach, 128 N.J. Eq. 77, 78 (Ch. 1940), aff'd. 128 N.J. Eq. 478 (1941). "Where customers are known…