From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hauss v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 10, 2023
No. CV-20-00097-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2023)

Opinion

CV-20-00097-TUC-JGZ

01-10-2023

George M Hauss, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich. (Doc 11.) Magistrate Judge Markovich recommends denying Hauss's request for habeas relief. (Id.)

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

Upon review of the record, the Court will adopt Magistrate Judge Markovich's recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-54 (1985).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is adopted.

2. Hauss' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied.

4. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.


Summaries of

Hauss v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jan 10, 2023
No. CV-20-00097-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Hauss v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:George M Hauss, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jan 10, 2023

Citations

No. CV-20-00097-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jan. 10, 2023)