From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haught v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 16, 1934
71 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)

Opinion

No. 16780.

Delivered May 16, 1934.

Statement of Facts — Bills of Exception.

Nothing is presented for review by record containing neither statement of facts or bills of exception.

Appeal from the District Court of Rains County. Tried below before the Hon. Chas. Berry, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for burglary; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Howard L. Martin, of Grand Saline, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is burglary of a private residence; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Haught v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 16, 1934
71 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
Case details for

Haught v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY HAUGHT v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 16, 1934

Citations

71 S.W.2d 518 (Tex. Crim. App. 1934)
71 S.W.2d 518