From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haught v. City of Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 12, 2015
2:11-CV-01653-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)

Opinion

          JOHN DOUGLAS BARR, TROY DOUGLAS MUDFORD, DAVID LEE CASE, ESTEE LEWIS, CATHLEEN T. BARR, BARR & MUDFORD, LLP, Redding, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATRINA HAUGHT.

          ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, BRUCE A. KILDAY, Attorneys for Defendants, THE CITY OF ANDERSON; THE CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; and DALE WEBB, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Anderson Police Department.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND NUMBER OF DEPOSITIONS TO BE TAKEN BY PLAINTIFF

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, KATRINA HAUGHT, and Defendants, THE CITY OF ANDERSON and CHIEF DALE WEBB, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to, and respectfully request the Court enter an Order extending the number of depositions to be taken by plaintiff to 11 depositions, instead of 10 under F.R.C.P. 30.

         The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists for extending the number of depositions permitted by plaintiff to 11 to allow plaintiff to depose the necessary witnesses in this case. Since the instant action involves an entire police department, and the training and supervision of certain officers, there are dozens of people with pertinent information that could assist plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have done their best to curtail the number of depositions, but given the circumstances surrounding this case, plaintiffs are unable to limit the necessary deponents to 10 people. Defendants appreciate plaintiff's situation, and are accommodating plaintiff's request accordingly.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff be allowed to take 11 depositions, instead of 10, as indicated in F.R.C.P. 30.


Summaries of

Haught v. City of Anderson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 12, 2015
2:11-CV-01653-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Haught v. City of Anderson

Case Details

Full title:KATRINA HAUGHT, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF ANDERSON; THE CITY OF ANDERSON…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 12, 2015

Citations

2:11-CV-01653-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2015)