From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haughey v. Artus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-21

In the Matter of William J. HAUGHEY, Appellant, v. Dale ARTUS, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

William J. Haughey, Coxsackie, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


William J. Haughey, Coxsackie, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Richards, J.), entered July 26, 2010 in Clinton County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a determination of respondent finding him guilty, after a tier II disciplinary hearing, of violating the rule prohibiting unauthorized legal assistance. In lieu of answering, respondent sought to dismiss the proceeding on the basis of lack of timely service upon respondent and the Attorney General. Supreme Court granted the motion on that basis and dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

Significantly, respondent has now written to this Court withdrawing the objection to the timeliness of service based upon the discovery of a notarized affidavit of service demonstratingthat service of the applicable papers had been properly accomplished in accordance with the order to show cause. As respondent has not been given an opportunity to submit an answer, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings ( see Matter of Sital v. Fischer, 76 A.D.3d 723, 905 N.Y.S.2d 529 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 20 days of the date of this Court's decision.

PETERS, P.J., ROSE, SPAIN, KAVANAGH and GARRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haughey v. Artus

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Haughey v. Artus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William J. HAUGHEY, Appellant, v. Dale ARTUS, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 21, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 1242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
946 N.Y.S.2d 900
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5037

Citing Cases

Kairis v. Smith

The record reveals, and respondent now concedes, that petitioner had served his papers in accordance with the…

Hammond v. Lavalley

This appeal ensued. Significantly, respondents have now withdrawn their timeliness objection based upon the…