From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hauber v. Hauber

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2021
315 So. 3d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D20-1655

03-24-2021

Edward HAUBER, Appellant, v. Cynthia HAUBER, Appellee.

Alan Jay Braverman and Marko Ilich of Stok Kon + Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. M. Shannon McLin and Melissa Alagna of Florida Appeals, Orlando, for appellee.


Alan Jay Braverman and Marko Ilich of Stok Kon + Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

M. Shannon McLin and Melissa Alagna of Florida Appeals, Orlando, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Casto v. Casto , 508 So. 2d 330, 334 (Fla. 1987).

Warner, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hauber v. Hauber

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 24, 2021
315 So. 3d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Hauber v. Hauber

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD HAUBER, Appellant, v. CYNTHIA HAUBER, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

315 So. 3d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)