From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatton v. Mills

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02416 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02416 JAM KJN P

06-06-2022

ERIC DEWAYNE HATTON, Plaintiff, v. MILLS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 12, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 12, 2022, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without leave to amend.


Summaries of

Hatton v. Mills

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:21-cv-02416 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Hatton v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DEWAYNE HATTON, Plaintiff, v. MILLS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02416 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)