From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatter v. Higgins

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 4, 2024
4:24-cv-00540-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00540-JM-JTK

09-04-2024

MALCOLM HATTER, JR. # 13093-23 PLAINTIFF v. ERIC S. HIGGINS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.

2. The Court recommends that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Hatter v. Higgins

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 4, 2024
4:24-cv-00540-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Hatter v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM HATTER, JR. # 13093-23 PLAINTIFF v. ERIC S. HIGGINS, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 4, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00540-JM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2024)