Opinion
March, 1910.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., and Williams, J., who dissented, upon the ground that at the time of the accident the plaintiff was not engaged in the work of the defendant.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hatten v. Hyde-McFarlin Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Hatten v. Hyde-McFarlin Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Hatten v. Hyde-McFarlin Company
Case Details
Full title:John Hatten, Respondent, v. Hyde-McFarlin Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1910
Citations
137 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)