Hatley v. State

Full title: Anthony G. HATLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

548 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105991

06-12-2018

Anthony G. HATLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda Renee Robinson, Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Garrick F. D Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda Renee Robinson, Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Garrick F. D Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAMAnthony G. Hatley appeals from the motion court’s "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment," denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).