Opinion
No. 19-16679
07-17-2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 3:18-cv-08332-DLR MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Alison Lorraine Hatheway appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing her action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. Picot v. Weston, 780 F.3d 1206, 1211 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Hatheway's action for lack of personal jurisdiction because Hatheway failed to allege facts sufficient to establish that defendants had continuous and systematic contacts with Arizona to establish general personal jurisdiction, or sufficient claim-related contacts with Arizona to provide the court with specific personal jurisdiction over defendants. See CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc., 653 F.3d 1066, 1074-76 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing requirements for general and specific personal jurisdiction).
AFFIRMED.