From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hathaway v. Cote

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 10, 2013
2:12-cv-614-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cv-614-CL

05-10-2013

JASON LEE HATHAWAY, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS SGT. E. COTE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the Report is correct.

I adopt the Report and Recommendation (#53). Defendants' motion to dismiss (#42) is GRANTED and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hathaway v. Cote

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 10, 2013
2:12-cv-614-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Hathaway v. Cote

Case Details

Full title:JASON LEE HATHAWAY, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS SGT. E. COTE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-614-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)