From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatfield v. Bio-Med. Applications of Ala., Inc.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv53-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv53-MHT (WO)

09-26-2012

AKILAH E. HATFIELD, Plaintiff, v. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF ALABAMA, INC., etc., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 70) is adopted.

(2) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 49) is granted.

(3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by her complaint.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hatfield v. Bio-Med. Applications of Ala., Inc.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv53-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Hatfield v. Bio-Med. Applications of Ala., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AKILAH E. HATFIELD, Plaintiff, v. BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF ALABAMA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv53-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Redmon v. Massey Auto

even more so than the preliminary statement found to be absolutely privileged in Walker. See Hatfield v.…