From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatcher v. Banfield

Supreme Court of Florida
May 13, 1964
162 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33364.

May 13, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

W. Robert Mann (of Knowles, Knowles Mann), Bradenton, for petitioners.

B. Clarke Nichols (of Smith, Carroll, Vega, Brown Nichols), Naples, for William Banfield.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 27, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hatcher v. Banfield

Supreme Court of Florida
May 13, 1964
162 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Hatcher v. Banfield

Case Details

Full title:JACK HATCHER, EMPLOYER, AND LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CARRIER…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 13, 1964

Citations

162 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1964)