From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 22, 2008
993 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 2008)

Opinion

No. SC08-1032.

September 22, 2008.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D08-1186, 502008AP900003AMB, 79-3126-CFA02.


Petitioner's "Motion to Supplement Original Petition With Following Facts Pursuant to Rule 9.225, F.R.A.P." is hereby granted.

The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 913 So. 2d 541, 543-544 (Fla. 2005) (stating that "neither [petitioner] cites an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority, and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petitions"); St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So. 2d 1304, 1305 (Fla. 1980).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, BELL, and CANADY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hastings v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 22, 2008
993 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 2008)
Case details for

Hastings v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY ROBERT HASTINGS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 22, 2008

Citations

993 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 2008)

Citing Cases

Hastings v. State

ting that the Court generally will not consider the repetitive petitions of persons who have abused the…

Hastings v. State

We conclude that, unless he is stopped, Hastings will continue to file meritless requests for relief in this…