From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. Osius

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 5, 1958
101 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1958)

Opinion

March 5, 1958.

Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Hector, Faircloth Rutledge, Miami, for petitioner.

Eli Breger, Miami Beach, and Harvey J. St. Jean, Miami, for respondent.


Petition for certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, is granted. 97 So.2d 623.

The cause is hereby ordered placed on the oral argument calendar to be heard in due course. No further record or briefs are required.

Argument shall be limited to the question of whether the decision of the District Court is in direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla. 1954, 72 So.2d 800, and similar cases holding that certiorari will not issue to review an order or judgment which may be brought to the appellate court for review on a direct appeal.

TERRELL, C.J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hastings v. Osius

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 5, 1958
101 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1958)
Case details for

Hastings v. Osius

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE V. HASTINGS, PETITIONER, v. LOUISE Z. OSIUS, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 5, 1958

Citations

101 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1958)