From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. Nifty Gateway, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22 Civ. 10517 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10517 (AT)

12-14-2022

JOHN HASTINGS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Plaintiff, v. NIFTY GATEWAY, LLC and THE GEMINI TRUST COMPANY, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hastings v. Nifty Gateway, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22 Civ. 10517 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Hastings v. Nifty Gateway, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HASTINGS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 10517 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)