From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 12, 2022
No. 7628-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

7628-21S

01-12-2022

Dianne Hastings Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On July 23, 2021, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and as to Tax Years 2020 and 2021, on the ground that no notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been sent to petitioner with respect to taxable years 2020 and 2021, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to petitioner's tax years 2020 and 2021 that would confer jurisdiction on the Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioner has failed to do so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and To Strike as to Tax Years 2020 and 2021 is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to taxable years 2020 and 2021. References to those years in the petition are deemed stricken.


Summaries of

Hastings v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 12, 2022
No. 7628-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Hastings v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Dianne Hastings Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

No. 7628-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 12, 2022)