From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haste v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 30, 2019
NO. 14-18-00500-CR (Tex. App. May. 30, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 14-18-00500-CR

05-30-2019

JAVANTE CHAUNCEY HASTE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 351st District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1478749

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was convicted on his plea of guilty to aggravated robbery. His appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We have not handed down an opinion in this case.

On April 26, 2019, appellant filed a pro se, handwritten motion. The motion states in relevant part:

I am currently on appeal but my lawyer filed for a Anders brief. So I am requesting that my appeal be closed and my sentence be made final so I can proceed with my writ of habeas corpus. Thank you very much.
We have construed appellant's motion as one for voluntary dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.

A motion for voluntary dismissal is required to be signed by both the appellant and his attorney. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). "[T]he purpose of the requirement in rule 42.2(a) that a motion to withdraw appeal be signed by both appellant and counsel may have been to protect appellants from having their appeals dismissed by counsel without their consent and to insure that counsel had notice of the dismissal in order to allow him to counsel his client concerning the decision." Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd).

Appellant's motion bears what purports to be his signature but does not bear the signature of his lawyer. For that reason, on April 30, 2019, we notified appellant's counsel of our intent to dismiss this appeal on appellant's motion unless counsel demonstrated, within 10 days, meritorious grounds for retaining the appeal. No response has been filed.

Accordingly, on our own motion and for good cause, we suspend the operation of rule 42.2(a)'s requirement that appellant's counsel sign the motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 ("On a party's motion or on its own initiative an appellate court may—to expedite a decision or for other good cause—suspend a rule's operation in a particular case and order a different procedure . . . .").

We GRANT appellant's motion and DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Haste v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 30, 2019
NO. 14-18-00500-CR (Tex. App. May. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Haste v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAVANTE CHAUNCEY HASTE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: May 30, 2019

Citations

NO. 14-18-00500-CR (Tex. App. May. 30, 2019)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a); id. R. 2; see also Haste v. State, No. 14-18-00500-CR, 2019 WL 2305753, at *1…