From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hassler v. Connolly

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 18, 1936
82 F.2d 1010 (3d Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 5830.

January 30, 1936. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; George A. Welsh, Judge.

For opinion below, see Art Print Shop v. Friederberger-Aron Mfg. Co., 14 F. Supp. 120.

Isaac Hassler, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Andrew R. McCown, Shields, Clark, Brown McCown, Felix Felix, and Hirschwald, Goff Rubin, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


The facts and circumstances connected with this equity receivership are voluminous and involved. The claim of the appellant for services was fully considered by the court below. It has had careful consideration given it by this court, with the result we find no error in the District Court's refusal of appellant's claim. So holding, its refusal is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hassler v. Connolly

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 18, 1936
82 F.2d 1010 (3d Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Hassler v. Connolly

Case Details

Full title:Isaac HASSLER, Appellant, v. James J. CONNOLLY, J. Willison Smith, and…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 1936

Citations

82 F.2d 1010 (3d Cir. 1936)