From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hasnat v. ADP Realty Ltd.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

No. 2830 Index No. 809691/21 Case No. 2024-02458

10-15-2024

Maleka Hasnat, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADP Realty Ltd., Defendant-Respondent.

Cohen & Cohen Personal Injury Lawyers, P.C., Forest Hills (Albert I. Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Milber Makris Plousadis, LLP, Woodbury (Lynsay A. Dyszler of counsel), for respondent.


Cohen & Cohen Personal Injury Lawyers, P.C., Forest Hills (Albert I. Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Milber Makris Plousadis, LLP, Woodbury (Lynsay A. Dyszler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Webber, J.P., Kapnick, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered April 3, 2024, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion to vacate denied.

The motion to vacate the default judgment should not have been granted under CPLR 317 because defendant failed to show a meritorious defense. The affidavit of defendant's president is insufficient "as it contains only a general assertion of lack of knowledge of the... alleged defect in the" stairway (Gomez v One Sickles St. Co., LP, 165 A.D.3d 597, 597 [1st Dept 2018]; see also Davis v Blev Realty LLC, 217 A.D.3d 563, 564 [1st Dept 2023]).

Furthermore, under CPLR 5015(a), defendant's failure to update its address on file with the Secretary of State for 19 years after moving offices does not constitute a reasonable excuse for the default (see e.g. NYCTL 2015-A Trust v Diffo Props. Corp., 171 A.D.3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019], lv dismissed 34 N.Y.3d 1198 [2020]; Gomez, 165 A.D.3d at 597).

To the extent defendant relies on CPLR 3012(d), that provision is inapplicable here (see U.S. Bank Trust N.A. v Rivera, 187 A.D.3d 624, 625 [1st Dept 2020]). In any event, CPLR 3012(d) also requires a reasonable excuse for a delay, which defendant has failed to set forth (see Majada Inc. v E&A RE Capital Corp., 205 A.D.3d 648, 649 [1st Dept 2022]).


Summaries of

Hasnat v. ADP Realty Ltd.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

Hasnat v. ADP Realty Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Maleka Hasnat, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADP Realty Ltd.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 15, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 5052 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)