From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haskell v. Turowski

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 28, 2014
SC: 149854 (Mich. Oct. 28, 2014)

Opinion

SC: 149854

10-28-2014

VIRGINIA DIANE HASKELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. PAUL P. TUROWSKI and SHARON L. TUROWSKI, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants- Appellants, and NEWAYGO COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant, v. JOSEPH SELLA, Third-Party Defendant/Cross Plaintiff-Appellee.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices COA: 314043
Newaygo CC: 11-019670-CZ

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2014

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Haskell v. Turowski

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 28, 2014
SC: 149854 (Mich. Oct. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Haskell v. Turowski

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA DIANE HASKELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. PAUL P…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 28, 2014

Citations

SC: 149854 (Mich. Oct. 28, 2014)