From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hashem v. Still

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
No. C 3:11-cv-2974 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 3:11-cv-2974

10-26-2011

AMNAR NAZIH HASHEM, Plaintiff, v. DAVID STILL, District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Francisco District Office, et al., Defendants.

TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division DAVID J. KLINE Director J. MAX WEINTRAUB (VA 36188) Senior Litigation Counsel LANA L. VAHAB (DC 976203) Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section Attorneys for Defendants


TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division

DAVID J. KLINE

Director

J. MAX WEINTRAUB (VA 36188) Senior Litigation Counsel LANA L. VAHAB (DC 976203) Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice Civil Division

Office of Immigration Litigation

District Court Section

Washington, D.C. 20044

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING

THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Through their respective counsel, the parties agree and stipulate as follows:

Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") is ready to adjudicate Plaintiff Amnar Nazih Hashem's ("Plaintiff's") adjustment of status application ("I-485"). To that end, USCIS mailed Plaintiff a Referral for FD 258 Fingerprints notice ("Notice") on October 19, 2011. The Notice asks Plaintiff to appear at the Santa Ana, California office of USCIS for fingerprinting between October 19, 2011, and November 21, 2011 (the "scheduled period"). Plaintiff agrees to appear for, and submit to, fingerprinting during this scheduled period and to cooperate with USCIS to facilitate a timely adjudication of his application. USCIS agrees to adjudicate Plaintiff's I-485 within 60 days of Plaintiff's submission of fingerprints.

Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismissal of this action without prejudice. The parties agree that Plaintiff may reopen this action, upon filing notice thereof, in the event that USCIS has not adjudicated his I-485 within 60 days of his submitting to fingerprinting during the scheduled period. The parties further agree that if Plaintiff does not reopen this action within the period described above, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice.

The parties agree that, in the event that Plaintiff reopens this action in accordance with this stipulated dismissal, Defendants shall respond to the Complaint within fifteen days of reopening.

The parties further agree to bear their own fees and costs related to this litigation.

MARC ALAN KARLIN

Karlin & Karlin

3701 Wilshire Blvd.

Counsel for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,

LANA LUNSKAYA VAHAB

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division

Office of Immigration Litigation

District Court Section

Washington, D.C. 20044

Counsel for Defendants

[Proposed] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

JOSEPHC SPERO


Summaries of

Hashem v. Still

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
No. C 3:11-cv-2974 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Hashem v. Still

Case Details

Full title:AMNAR NAZIH HASHEM, Plaintiff, v. DAVID STILL, District Director of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

No. C 3:11-cv-2974 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)