Harwell v. First Federal Savings Loan Association

4 Citing cases

  1. BBC Land & Development, Inc. v. Bank of North Georgia

    670 S.E.2d 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    Appellants had no right to a jury trial on the Bank's application for confirmation under OCGA § 44-14-161. Harwell v. First Fed. Sav. c., 245 Ga. 757 ( 267 SE2d 229) (1980). Judgment affirmed. Ruffin, P. J., and Bernes, J., concur.

  2. Fayette Promenade v. Branch Bank. Trust Co.

    574 S.E.2d 319 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 14 times

    " Id., citing Harwell v. First Fed. Sav. c. Assn., 245 Ga. 757 ( 267 S.E.2d 229) (1980); Classic Mtg. Enterprises v. Continental Mtg. Investors, 135 Ga. App. 105 ( 217 S.E.2d 411) (1975).Marrett Properties, supra at 267.

  3. Marett Properties v. Centerbank Mtg. Co.

    419 S.E.2d 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that when establishing true market value of a single investment opportunity, "an expert must apply his own knowledge and ideas in order to reach an opinion as to the market value of a project"

    The true market value of such property would be analyzed as "a single investment opportunity" rather than by adding together the true market values of each of the lots. See Harwell v. First Fed. Sav. c., 245 Ga. 757 ( 267 S.E.2d 229) (1980); Classic Enterprises v. Continental Mtg. Investors, 135 Ga. App. 105 ( 217 S.E.2d 411) (1975). In establishing the true market value of such a single investment opportunity, an expert must apply his own knowledge and ideas in order to reach an opinion as to the market value of a project.

  4. Marion G. Davis, Inc. v. Cameron-Brown Company

    340 S.E.2d 216 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    Here the security deed merely described the property as two tracts and contained no express requirement that appellee sell the property in individual units. See also Harwell v. First Fed. Savings c. Assn., 245 Ga. 757 ( 267 S.E.2d 229) (1980). Appellant contends, however, that the separate valuation of each individual unit is mandated by OCGA § 44-3-96, which provides, in part, that "[f]or all purposes, each condominium unit shall constitute a separate parcel of real property which shall be distinct from all other condominium units."