From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 26, 1980
385 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 80-1606.

August 26, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Ellen Morphonios Gable, J.

Alexander Harvin, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


The appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 to vacate the judgment and sentence entered against him after a guilty plea. The entry of the plea effectively waived his presently asserted claims that his confession to the crime was involuntary and that evidence against him was the product of an unlawful search and seizure; hence, these matters cannot be considered in a Rule 3.850 proceeding. E.g., Whitlow v. State, 256 So.2d 48 (Fla.2d DCA 1971); Hand v. State, 208 So.2d 307 (Fla.2d DCA 1968). Since there was no allegation that the plea itself was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, or was otherwise subject to legal challenge, the motion was properly denied without evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 26, 1980
385 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Harvin v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER HARVIN, A/K/A "ZEKE", APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 26, 1980

Citations

385 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

See Tisdale v. State, 282 So. 3d 998, 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("Rule 3.850 provides a ‘two-year time…

Van Fuquay v. State

This question has been answered in various cases and various Florida district courts where it has been held…