From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2010
2:10-CV-01807-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)

Opinion

2:10-CV-01807-PMP-PAL.

December 6, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration are Defendants' fully-briefed Motions to Dismiss, and For an Order Expunging Lis Pendens (Docs. #13-#14) filed on November 5, 2010.

The Court finds that Plaintiff Harvey has failed in his Opposition (Doc. #18) to address any of the substantive arguments asserted by Defendants in support of their motion to dismiss. Moreover, it is clear that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action attempts to re-litigate matters that have previously been considered and rejected by another judge of this Court and are hence barred by the Doctrine of Preclusion, which cannot be cured by amendment of the pleadings. The Court further finds that defendants are entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff's claims for the substantive reasons set forth in Defendants' motion to dismiss. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #13) and Motion for Order Expunging Lis Pendens (Doc. #14) are hereby GRANTED.

DATED: December 6, 2010.


Summaries of

Harvey v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2010
2:10-CV-01807-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Harvey v. Washington Mutual Bank

Case Details

Full title:EASTON HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 6, 2010

Citations

2:10-CV-01807-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)