Opinion
22-6077
09-22-2022
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FREDERICK RUSSELL, Asst. Warden Defendant-Appellee and D. LANDAUER, N.P.; DR. ARAKAKY; DAVID A. RYLAK, MD of Augusta Health Center; MICHAEL R. PLAUTZ, MD Augusta Otolaryngology Assoc.; STEPHEN PARK, MD of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; DR. DANIEL PETERS, of the University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology; C. D. WHITLOCK, Lieutenant; MCDANIEL, Correctional Officer; PEALE, Correctional Officer; E. SHIPP, RN, Director of Nursing; T. HAMILTON, RN; JOHN A. WOODSON, “ACC” Warden; DR. S. HERRICK, Director of Health Services; THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AUGUSTA HEALTH CENTER; UVA NEUROSURGERY; LACOUR, Laundry Manager; THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, exclusively; FRIDLEY, Sgt.; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections; S. CONNER, “ACC” Grievance Coordinator; LEWIS, Augusta Correctional Center Officer; TAMMY COYNER, Defendants.
Tamar Devell Harvey, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 29, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00097-EKD-JCH)
Tamar Devell Harvey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Tamar Devell Harvey appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to David A. Rylak and D. Landauer, and granting S. Conner's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and judgment entered in favor of Frederick Russell after a jury trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Harvey v. Russell, No. 7:18-cv-00097-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2022). We deny Harvey's motion and supplemental motion for transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We limit our review to issues presented in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014).