From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Proto Prop. Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Jul 26, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 81794 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

Motion No: 2017-00065 KC

07-26-2017

Gladys Harvey, Respondent, v. Proto Property Services, Appellant.


MICHELLE WESTON

THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 17, 2016, and to continue a stay granted by decision and order on motion of this court dated March 13, 2017.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal is granted and the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to October 6, 2017; and it is further,

ORDERED that the branch of the motion seeking to continue the stay is granted on condition that appellant perfect the appeal by October 6, 2017; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event that the above condition is not met, the court, on its own motion, may dismiss the appeal and/or vacate the stay, or respondent may move to dismiss the appeal and/or vacate the stay on three days' notice.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Harvey v. Proto Prop. Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Jul 26, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 81794 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Harvey v. Proto Prop. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Gladys Harvey, Respondent, v. Proto Property Services, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Jul 26, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 81794 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)