Opinion
23-10049
01-16-2024
WAYNE LAMARR HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES JAMSEN, et al., Defendants.
Curtis Ivy, United States Magistrate Judge
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DECEMBER 19, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 48)
F. Kay Behm, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy's December 19, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 48). Magistrate Judge Ivy recommends that Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 23, 35, 43) be granted. (ECF No. 48). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 48) and GRANTS Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 23, 35, 43).
SO ORDERED.