From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Ehtisham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1986
116 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 27, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion for summary judgment granted and action dismissed as against defendant Ehtisham.

In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment, a party is required to lay bare its proof. In the instant case, the record was devoid of any evidence that the defendant doctor saw or attended plaintiff Henry Harvey at any time later than August of 1979. The 2 1/2-year Statute of Limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions (CPLR 214-a) ran in this case, therefore, in February of 1982, and the instant action, which plaintiffs commenced in July of 1982, five months after the statute expired, was untimely. Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harvey v. Ehtisham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1986
116 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Harvey v. Ehtisham

Case Details

Full title:HENRY HARVEY et al., Respondents, v. SYED EHTISHAM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Flego v. Vilasi

The decedent's medical records support the appellants' contentions and they demonstrate that the appellants…