From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Jun 28, 1940
143 Fla. 559 (Fla. 1940)

Opinion

Opinion Filed June 28, 1940

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, T. Frank Hobson, Judge.

Carey Harrison, for Appellant;

Askew Kiernan, for Appellee.


This is the second appearance of this case here. See Harvey v. City of St. Petersburg, 138 Fla. 597, 189 So. 861.

The appeal in that case was from interlocutory order. This appeal is from final decree.

The law of the case is found stated in the opinion and judgment, supra, and no useful purpose may be served by repeating what was said there.

The decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and BUFORD and THOMAS, J. J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices BROWN and CHAPMAN not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.


Summaries of

Harvey v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Jun 28, 1940
143 Fla. 559 (Fla. 1940)
Case details for

Harvey v. City of St. Petersburg

Case Details

Full title:LUCILE HARVEY, an Unmarried Woman, v. THE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Jun 28, 1940

Citations

143 Fla. 559 (Fla. 1940)
197 So. 116

Citing Cases

Schempp v. Schempp

Under the "law of the case" doctrine, questions decided on appeal in courts of ultimate resort must govern…

Olin's, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, Inc.

Under the principle of the "law of the case" the decision on the prior appeal renders these questions no…