From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 22, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-2232-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-2232-AP

04-22-2013

PEGGY CHARLENE HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge John L. Kane


ORDER

Kane, J.

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Under the unique circumstances of this case, where timely filing was prevented by one day because of ambiguities in the court's electronic filing system, I exercise my inherent authority to exercise discretion to toll the statute of limitations by one day. The Motion to Dismiss (doc. #12) is DENIED. The complaint is considered as timely filed on August 20, 2012, which it the date of the attempted filing. Counsel shall confer and advise the court of their timeline for the answer due date and submission of their Joint Case Management Plan.

BY THE COURT:

________________

John L. Kane, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Harvey v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 22, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-2232-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Harvey v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PEGGY CHARLENE HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-2232-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 22, 2013)