From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey Fishbein v. Abraham Chaimovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-01035.

May 4, 2010.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), entered December 18, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants and against him, dismissing the complaint.

Jeffrey Levitt, Amityville, N.Y., for appellant.

Speyer Perlberg, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Thomas E. Scott and Dennis M. Perlberg of counsel), for respondents.

JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JJ.

DECISION ORDER.

Before: Covello, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the trial court, and this Court may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that in a close case, the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses ( see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc., v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499; A-Tech Concrete Co., Inc. v Tilcon N.Y., Inc., 60 AD3d 603, 604). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination.

[Prior Case History: 2008 NY Slip Op 33109(U).]


Summaries of

Harvey Fishbein v. Abraham Chaimovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Harvey Fishbein v. Abraham Chaimovitz

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY FISHBEIN, Appellant, v. ABRAHAM CHAIMOVITZ et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3866
899 N.Y.S.2d 672