From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvest Riata, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 24, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-24-2017

HARVEST RIATA, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville (Giuseppe Franzella of Counsel), for appellant. Alston & Bird LLP, New York (John P. Doherty of Counsel), for respondents.


Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville (Giuseppe Franzella of Counsel), for appellant.

Alston & Bird LLP, New York (John P. Doherty of Counsel), for respondents.

The loan provision requiring plaintiff borrower to deposit and maintain a certain balance in a reserve rollover account is unambiguous in setting a minimum balance (see Greenfield v. Philles Records, 98 N.Y.2d 562, 569–570, 750 N.Y.S.2d 565, 780 N.E.2d 166 [2002] ). Plaintiff was thus barred from invading that minimum balance for disbursements for replacement tenant improvements and broker commissions when an anchor tenant's lease terminated and was not renewed.

RENWICK, J.P., KAPNICK, GESMER, and KERN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harvest Riata, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 24, 2017
61 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Harvest Riata, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:HARVEST RIATA, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 24, 2017

Citations

61 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)