From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartwell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 3, 2015
NUMBER 13-14-00087-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00087-CR

09-03-2015

ROSS ALLEN HARTWELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 390th District Court of Travis County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria
OrderPer Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's pro se motion to reinstate motion for rehearing. We denied appellant's motion for rehearing because it violated the prohibition against hybrid representation. On August 22, 2015, appellant filed this motion asserting that he was not represented by counsel at the time he filed his original motion. Because the status of appellant's representation is unclear from the record, we GRANT appellant's motion to reinstate and withdraw our prior disposition of July 30, 2015. After considering appellant's motion for rehearing on the merits, it is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of September, 2015.


Summaries of

Hartwell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 3, 2015
NUMBER 13-14-00087-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Hartwell v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROSS ALLEN HARTWELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 3, 2015

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00087-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 3, 2015)